> I pay for Consumer Reports Online. It's worth it to me. But that is unique
> information backed by a decades-old brand name that has established a bond
> of trust with its customers.

Which are major assets that such publications rely on, as they're 
the reason that they can charge and have people pay.
 
> And note that CU and the WSJ have never derived the bulk of their revenue
> from ads (in fact, CU is ad free), whereas most publications are almost
> entirely ad-supported. Major commercial publications typically derive
> 60-90% of their revenue from their advertisers. Subscription revenue is
> only a small percentage of their total revenue stream.

Most *print* publications, I assume you're referring to here. And 
then of course the amount of advertising-to-editorial has a bearing 
on credibility and audience (some publications exist because 
people want to see the ads; some publications I am wary of 
because of the obvious relationship between advertising and 
advertorial). I suspect that people will be more wary of the Web as 
we start to see more links (overt or covert) between content and 
vested interests. 

> As publications move online and reduce or eliminate their production and
> distribution costs associated with moving pieces of paper around, they
> will stop charging for a subscription and rely entirely on advertising.

The hard thing is to push the traditional advertisers into the 
electronic medium if they have had little or no experience of it. 
There's a whole new education needed just to get them to think 
about it, and it becomes very difficult when they themselves have 
no Web presence.

It also means you have to think very hard about the advertising 
support mechanisms you have in place on your site to provide 
them with the traffic analysis on which they will make their 
purchasing decisions.

And then there's the big debate sabout whether CPM is an 
appropriate mechanism to use, how advertising metrics differ online 
to the more traditional avenues etc.

> This is not bad news for small publications, since web production costs
> are a small fraction of what they now pay to print and mail out their
> product. In fact, small publications and online-only publications will
> flourish.

So long as they find a way to avoid the huge pitfall of ongoing 
maintenance which can be very time-consuming and costly. As 
publishers ourselves, we appreciate the relative low costs of the 
Web as a medium (particularly in reproducing colour), but as Web 
people we also recognise the huge potential for spending vast 
amounts of time (=dollars) on Web sites that are not pulling the 
money in.

We did find that the time taken to get something online for the NZ 
Science Monthly was causing us real hassles, even when we were 
doing a simple single-page precis of the print publication's 
contents. Consequently it was always bottom of the list and behind 
the times.

That's how we started to investigate automating print-to-Web 
publication managment, purely as a defensive manuevre on our 
part. By the time we realised it was a problem for lots of people 
(with commercial potential :-), we were well on the way to building 
TurboPress.

Ironically, the smaller publications are the ones with the greatest 
needs for a system that will handle as much automatically as 
possible, yet they are also the ones with the least economic 
underpinning and willingness to spend now to save in the long 
term. (After all , we can't *all* afford to throw the millions at Web 
development that the big publishers do annually -- much and all as 
we might like to.)

At least TurboPress has meant that we can now put an entire 
issue online with all indexing, linking, structure, navigation etc done 
automatically in 40 minutes flat! It also makes things a lot easier 
as an editor having access to a fast full text search of nine year's of 
publishing (makes answering queries about some article we ran 
three years ago a lot easier to track down).

We don't provide extra online content (although that seems to be 
the best way to attract and maintain online readership), but we do 
make the whole site available to subscribers without any extra 
charges (and there's on online sub only available too). We've found 
running an automatically managed, rotating, or keyword-related set 
of ads in a top of page banner works well for us, particularly when 
sold as an added value to print advertising or sponsorship. At least 
in the science and technology area you've got good odds that 
advertisers ahve substantial Web sites.

 An example of such is a site my wife and I run,
> http://www.women-connect-asia.com/. We have one sponsor and although the
> amount is quite modest, it's enough to make the site feasible. Of course,
> we're looking for more  :>)

Yeah, tell me about it :-) I have stacks and stacks of printouts on 
the publishing world and the Web. Everyone's still looking for 
suitable models.

Cheers,
Vicki

=============================================================================
South Pacific Information Services Ltd, Box 19-760, Christchurch, New Zealand
               [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spis.co.nz
              Tel: +64-3-384-5137 * Fax: +64-3-384-5138
   TurboPress Print-to-Web publishing automation * http://www.TurboPress.com
   <<< Web design, development and hosting * http://www.spis.co.nz >>>
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 Join The NEW Web Consultants Association FORUMS and CHAT:
   Register Today at: http://just4u.com/forums/
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
   Give the Gift of Life This Year...
     Just4U Stop Smoking Support forum - helping smokers for
      over three years-tell a friend: http://just4u.com/forums/
          To get 500 Banner Ads for FREE
    go to http://www.linkbuddies.com/start.go?id=111261
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to