web-sig  

Messages by Thread

• [Web-SIG] Call for Papers. SCENE 2024: Paper Submission date extended Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] Call for Papers: 2nd International workshop on Safeguarding CybersEcurity iN hEalthcare (SCENE 2024), May 6-9, 2024 Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] CfP:IEEE MetroXRAINE 2023 - Special Session on: "EXTENDED REALITY AS A GATEWAY TO THE METAVERSE: PRACTICES, THEORIES, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS" Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] CfP: ISSA track of the 16th IEEE SITIS 2022 conference. Submission deadline: August 19, 2022 Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] why function throws an error? נתי שטרן
• [Web-SIG] REMINDER CFP:ISSA: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, SERVICES AND APPLICATIONS 16th IEEE SITIS 2022 conference Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] CfP - CoopIS 2022: The 28th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems - deadline extended Mattia Occhipinti
• [Web-SIG] Flask Blueprints and Shared Configuration Settings Doran, Harold C.
• [Web-SIG] TENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS DISCOVERY AND ANALYSIS - SIMPDA 2020 Paolo Ceravolo
• [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School yun bao
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Mike Dewhirst
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Jack Bortone
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Jack Bortone
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Stéfane Fermigier
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Stéfane Fermigier
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Amirouche Boubekki
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Research Topics for Grad School Amirouche Boubekki
• [Web-SIG] Wsgiref x Form ? João Aguiar
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Wsgiref x Form ? Jack Bortone
• [Web-SIG] New django-hotsauce development group Etienne Robillard
• [Web-SIG] Django-hotsauce 0.7.8 release Etienne Robillard
• [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Etienne Robillard
  • Re: [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Etienne Robillard
  • Re: [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Randy Syring
  • Re: [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Etienne Robillard
  • Re: [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Etienne Robillard
  • Re: [Web-SIG] How to make REMOTE_USER variable private across WSGI middlewares? Etienne Robillard
• [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Alice Bevan–McGregor
  • Re: [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Marcel Hellkamp
  • Re: [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Alice Bevan–McGregor
  • Re: [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Ian Cordasco
  • Re: [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Alice Bevan–McGregor
  • Re: [Web-SIG] ANN: General availability of the WebCore WSGI nanoframework v2.0. Alex Grönholm
• [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Jason Madden
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Alan Kennedy
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Jason Madden
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Jason Madden
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Any practical reason type(environ) must be dict (not subclass)? Cory Benfield
• [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec chris . dent
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Collin Anderson
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Ionel Maries Cristian
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Collin Anderson
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Inviting feedback on my proposed "ASGI" spec Andrew Godwin
• [Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1 Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1 Dirkjan Ochtman
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1 Cory Benfield
• [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • [Web-SIG] Fwd: Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Fwd: Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Fwd: Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Fwd: Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI André Malo
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI André Malo
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Robert Brewer
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Collating follow-up on the future of WSGI Graham Dumpleton
• [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Armin Ronacher
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Armin Ronacher
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Damjan Georgievski
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Armin Ronacher
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Andrew Godwin
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Armin Ronacher
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Luke Plant
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Armin Ronacher
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest chris . dent
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest chris . dent
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Alan Kennedy
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest André Malo
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Amber "Hawkie" Brown
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Andrew Svetlov
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Amber "Hawkie" Brown
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Damjan Georgievski
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0 Round 2: requirements and call for interest Andrew Godwin
• [Web-SIG] Second Call for Papers - UMAP2015 - 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization kevin koidl
• [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Justin Holmes
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Sylvain Hellegouarch
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Justin Holmes
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Sylvain Hellegouarch
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncio (tulip)? Robert Collins
• [Web-SIG] handling different network protocols Robert Collins
• [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Graham Dumpleton
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Tres Seaver
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Draft 2: WSGI Response Upgrade Bridging Robert Collins
• [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs Sylvain Hellegouarch
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs Roberto De Ioris
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs Cory Benfield
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Pre-PEP: The WSGI Middleware Escape for Native Server APIs PJ Eby
• [Web-SIG] Combine wsgi and asyncio - possible? Frank Millman
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Combine wsgi and asyncio - possible? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] Combine wsgi and asyncio - possible? Frank Millman
• [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Dirkjan Ochtman
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: allowing short reads Antoine Pitrou
• [Web-SIG] WSGI: start_response buffers headers Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI: start_response buffers headers PJ Eby
• [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Dirkjan Ochtman
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Benoit Chesneau
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? Robert Collins
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? PJ Eby
  • Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI2: write callable? PJ Eby

• Earlier messages