> Paul Boddie wrote:
...I firmly believe in "unbundling" templating languages from frameworks.
But doesn't that just make more work for the poor sods who are trying to build things? After all, they have to rebundle them, don't they?
I don't think it's too bad. I'm happy with how ZPTKit works, even though ZPT isn't written (at all) with Webware in mind, or vice versa. OTOH, I don't think ZPT with Webware provides a very good experience without the non-trivial amount of glue code in ZPTKit, and that glue is kind of a NxM problem (# of template languages time # of frameworks). But it's not at the top of my list of problems.
Other templating languages, like Webware's PSP (which is JSP-like) are harder to generalize like this, because they are more closely tied to the underlying code (servlets in PSP's case). But, maybe ironically, I find an entirely separate templating language easier to work with.
-- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
