On 11/1/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably the name I like the most of what you've suggested would be
> "wsgi.routing_args", since that makes me think of "things that were
> captured on the way here" ("routing" more so than "dispatch").
> Actually, I don't really feel any strong difference between args and
> vars, though I suppose now that it's a tuple of positional and named
> values then "args" makes more sense.I kind of like something with "dispatch" in it but I don't really care. A brief name would be nice. path_args dispatch_args routing_args captures url_captures path_captures ... > This would break Luke's quick implementation, but hopefully he won't > mind. It hasn't been moved to "accepted" yet, so he was warned ;) Not a problem at all. I figured as much. :) - Luke _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
