On 11/1/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, maybe two namespace options: > > wsgiorg.* > websig.* > > I personally prefer wsgiorg, since we can do this on wsgi.org, and I > like what the name implies.
+1 for wsgiorg as a neutral namespace for building compatibility. -1 for process until we have problems that process might resolve. Premature bureaucratization is a sin worse than premature optimization. For my part, it is enough to say "hey everybody, we have a few tools that do the same thing in different ways (all the various dispatchers for instance); do we want to put things in a common place in a common way so that these tools are interchangeable?" That is all we have really done hear and I think it has worked out fine. Creating process is already creating overhead when there is no trouble that we need the process to address. What additional value comes from lending "authority" to this convention (url vars)? Bah! ;) Cheers, - Luke _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
