Jim Fulton wrote: > I'll respond in a high-level way. > > I believe, we're evaluating Paste Deploy at 2 levels: > > 1. Can we agree on a standard set of entry points so that WSGI > applications can be combined automatically? I think Paste Deploy > provides at least good start on this. > > 2. Do we want to reuse it's configuration syntax.
Yes, I hope people will look at these separately. The entry points provide a consistent way to get at middleware and applications. I've been careful to not expose the actual configuration file to applications, and I like that. It makes it possible to discuss these separately. -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
