On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 05:00 PM 10/4/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: >> Your are making a critical decision here. >> You are lowering the level of WSGI to match the level of average WSGI >> middlewares programmers. > > No, we're just getting rid of legacy cruft that's hard to support > correctly. There's a big difference.
Getting the start_response dance down and understanding how it plays with middleware is *hard*. Even if we called it something other than WSGI 2.0 (which I don't think we should, because it really is an evolution), returning the three-tuple is the right thing to do. - C _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
