Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: > [...] > If we were just now defining WSGI 1.0, I would let it be any method and > explicitly document that servers doing cache validation or processing a > HEAD method can skip iteration of the body, so that you can get better > performance. > > However, if we put this language into WSGI 1.0, I'm wary of breaking > stuff that exists in the field; indeed it might be better just to say > that it's up to the user to add middleware to do this, rather than > trying to get a common standard for how servers should handle it. >
You can always publish an addendum or errata to WSGI 1.0, or just WSGI 1.1 Regards Manlio Perillo _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
