FWIW, I have seen people want to use (mod_python didn't support it though), the description associated with a status so they could use different values for a 200 response as part of some strange web application testing framework.
Graham On 20/10/2007, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Brewer ha scritto: > > Manlio Perillo wrote: > >> Is a WSGI gateway allowed to ignore the Reason-Phrase part of the > >> status line returned by the WSGI application, and to use a server > >> defined phrase? > > > > I would be sad if a WSGI gateway did that to me. > > Why deny a web > > application developer the right to control that part of the output? > > > > The WSGI spec requires a full status line as a simplification for the > WSGI Gateway and not to give more control to WSGI applications. > > > Regards Manlio Perillo > _______________________________________________ > Web-SIG mailing list > Web-SIG@python.org > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/graham.dumpleton%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
