Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> As for general issues around best way to perform application
> initialisation, problem is that what is the most appropriate way may
> depend on the specific hosting mechanism. There isn't necessarily
> going to be one way that will suit all ways that WSGI can be hosted,
> thus why there partly isn't a standard on how to do it.
I appreciate all the good points you made above that I snipped, however,
surely the aim of WSGI is to allow the application author to not have to
worry so much about deployment but what I'm hearing is that if you get
your application implementation wrong, you'll suffer badly in lots of
deployment situations.
Of course, as someone trying to write a "good" wsgi app, I'd like it to
play nice in as many hosting scenarios as possible. What's the best way
to achieve that?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
