Brian Smith wrote:
> It would make more sense for the WSGI specification to explicitly say
> that WSGI gateways are responsible for setting the default logging
> output location.
Yes, although by this I assume you mean "WSGI gateways are responsible
for allowing configuration of log handlers for the python logging package"
> non-WSGI-aware modules that use the python logging module. The
> specification should then also explicitly say that WSGI applications
> should not redirect logging output to wsgi.errors or anywhere else.
Right.
> In
> fact, if that was done, there would be no reason to have wsgi.errors in
> the first place.
Exactly ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
