> I think WSGI is a better interface than any of these. BaseHTTPServer is > a reasonable basis for building a server (wsgiref.simple_server and > other's use it), but the subclasses are a little funky IMHO. Giving > them the name http.server makes them seem like the Right Solution, and I > don't think they are. They're more like server-building tools.
Yes, these classes are quite old, and have been updated only patchily over the years. I don't use them, either. But I guess the question is whether wsgiref.* is a better _implementation_ than any of these. We don't really have interfaces in Python. Bill _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
