Fred Drake wrote: > I'd be in favor of keeping only HTMLParser, with a compliant module > name ("htmlparser" doesn't seem unreasonable). The code was > originally derived from htmllib for the Grail webbrowser, mostly to > make things like attribute handling less painful.
Really? Cool. My first encounter with HTMLParser was when it was used for Zope's ZPT engine. I have memories of petitioning Guido to get it into the standard library at the time, although I guess my petitioning and its real reason for inclusion may have been coincidental. It's been a while since I had to use an html parser directly, but from what I remember, HTMLParser is much less of a PITA than the available standard library alternatives... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com