Graham Dumpleton ha scritto: > [...] > > Personally I believe that WSGI 1.0 should die along with Python 2.X. I > believe that WSGI 2.0 should be developed to replace it and the > introduction of Python 3.0 would be a great time to do that given that > people are going to have to change their code anyway and that code > isn't then likely to be backward compatible with Python 2.X. >
Fine with me but there is a *big* problem. WSGI 2.0 "breaks" support for asynchronous applications (since you can no more send headers in the app iter). I have finally implemented an extension for the Nginx's WSGI module that give support to asynchronos applications. I *need* it because in a application I'm developing I have to talk with a web service on the Internet, and not using an asynchronous http client (I'm using pycurl) is a suicide. > Graham > _______________________________________________ Manlio Perillo _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
