On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, so fix this. How hard can it be?
A bit of poking around turned up the post I was looking for: http://jmillikin.blogspot.com/2008/02/python-json-catastrophe.html Seems like his beef with simplejson is mostly Unicode/encoding handling; the floating-point stuff is a bit more debatable wrt to the spec, because rfc4627 doesn't say anything about how to handle these aside from saying that a "number" in JSON is allowed to contain a decimal point followed by more digits. Since the post is only a couple weeks old, I'm assuming that the Unicode stuff is current, so if the consensus is in favor of simplejson I suppose that'd be the area to concentrate on. -- "Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct." _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
