On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Alan Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Deron] > > (I just joined this list, so this reponse may not be threaded properly) > > [Bob] > > > I wasn't subscribed to the list at the time this came up, but I'm all > > for getting simplejson into the stdlib. > > Well, it appears we have a quorum of JSON<->python codec writers, > since I've written a jython module that I'd like to interoperate with > cpython codecs. I think it's appropriate for any discussions of JSON > to take place on the web-sig. > > I've been thinking about how to take this forward. I see two ways
Are there *really* competing implementations? I mean, it seems that pretty much everyone uses simplejson, at least in the web framework world. If someone writes a test for BMP, we'll fix it. As far as byte encoding detection I think that's beyond the scope of a JSON implementation and I think it's unnecessary in the first place. As far as Jython support goes, I suppose that's probably fixable without too much effort. I would imagine that the problems are just in the decoder, because of the sre_* module (ab)use. Was there some other reason for writing a Jython-specific codec? -bob _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
