So... what about WSGI 2? Let's not completely drop the ball on this. I *think* we were largely in agreement; debate got distracted by some async stuff, but I don't think we particularly have to deal with that for WSGI 2. I think we do more than enough if we figure out: WSGI in Python 3, i.e., with unicode; some basic errata kind of stuff, like readline signature; change the callable signature to remove start_response.
Would this be a new PEP or a revision? I think it should be a new PEP, as WSGI 1 remains valid and the same as it always was, and PEP 333 describes that. Is there anyone willing to make the revisions? -- Ian Bicking | http://blog.ianbicking.org | http://topplabs.org/civichacker _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
