Hi, René Dudfield schrieb: > I don't like yours and Ians changes with regard to cgi. cgi exists. > Breaking wsgi apps on cgi is silly. Can you give an example on where we break CGI compatibility?
> I think you mean pre-2.2 support, not python 2.2? iterators came > about in python 2.2. That might be. That was before my time. I'm pretty sure the first Python version I used was 2.3, but don't quote me on that. > Fixing the python3 wsgi situation needs to happen very soon(it's been > a year already!). I don't think delaying it any longer is a good idea > for python 3 and for python as a whole. So making a separate wsgi > version will not be good if a new wsgi comes out for python3. I agree that WSGI for Python 3 has to be fixed, I'm just not yet convinced that Python 3 is what will be relevant anytime soon. From my current perspective there is still too much left unanswered in Python 3. Regards, Armin _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
