On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Graham Dumpleton
<graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I would like to hear is PJE (who tends towards #3) and Robert
> Brewer (who tends towards #4). Can you guys give counter explanations
> as to why there arguments for bytes isn't valid. Ian, I don't think
> you have yet expressed your leaning, but would like to here your point
> as well.
>
> On top of the issues above, Armin believes 2to3 gives better results
> where bytes everywhere interpretation is used. Has anyone else
> actually tried 2to3 and have the experience with it?
>
> Graham
Here's a small wsgi server converted in the other thread.
I've also applied 2to3 to it so you can see what it does. Below are
links to diffs as well.
Note, this doesn't show the following things converted with 2to3:
- wsgi application.
- an application from a framework layered on top(eg cherrypy).
- wsgi middleware.
sneaky.py
- original python 2.x wsgi 1.0 server.
http://pastebin.com/f5c2cdd3b
sneaky3.py
- conversion done by hand.
http://pastebin.com/f7ae33d81
sneaky3_from2to3.py
- conversion from 2to3 (python 3.1 version of the script)
http://pastebin.com/f62a7d83a
(diffs for your comparison).
sneaky_2to3.diff
- a diff from sneaky.py and the 2to3 tool applied.
http://pastebin.com/f6d0430fa
sneaky_sneaky3.diff
- a diff from sneaky.py and sneak3.py
http://pastebin.com/f23cadbb0
cu,
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
