Hi all,
As external I'm a bit surprised and also disappointed about actual
process about choosing/discussing next features or changes of SGI spec.
I thought and I think process should be more formal. Like I see it
since some months, there are people trying to put their views and
technical considerations but that's all. I don't see any vote about
adding/editing current version of the spec. Some people try to
summarize, but there is also not formal way. Also working on different
repositories for one spec, with changes without votes make me think
something is wrong. I don't see any step in discussion nor roadmap and
a standard shouldn't be handled like this in my opinion.
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe votes are hidden, there is something outside I
ignore and I will be happy to be wrong on this. Anyway I really think
in this case process should be more transparent. At least having a
roadmap with formal steps like you have on other standards would help.
The web is changing, and as a developer I would like to know what and
when will be adapted WSGI to new needs.
- benoit
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
