2009/11/26 And Clover <and...@doxdesk.com>: > Whilst in principle I kind of agree with Malthe that keeping the CGI-derived > environ separate from items like wsgi.input would be appropriate, in > practice I don't give a stuff about it: the merged dictionary causes no > practical problems, and changing it would be an enormous upheaval for all > WSGI users.
It will anyway (moving to Python 3). > WSGI doesn't need to be pretty, it needs to be widely-compatible. Authors > who want pretty can use frameworks, which will be happy to deliver elegant > Request and Response objects. It's not about pretty more than PEP 8 is about pretty (hint: it's not). \malthe _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
