On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 14:46, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: > The last attempt was to have WSGI 1.1 as clarifications and Python 3.X. > > And when I say 'last attempt', yes there have been people who have > stepped up to try and get this to happen in the past. I think you > would be the 3rd time, excluding me in general having tried to push it > in the past and also given up. > > You really should perhaps look back through the archive of WEB-SIG > posts on Google Groups to understand the history and how this always > seems to just go around in circles. :-)
I've been on Web-SIG for quite a while now, exactly to keep track of these issues. Since there doesn't seem to be much traction, I figured it would be time to just get a new PEP together. To limit the amount of work, I'd go in the direction of having a single WSGI 2.0 PEP incorporating your suggestions (maybe minus the number 3), everything required for Python 3 (as outlined by your wiki page). The idea is that, as soon as there is a draft PEP, we can circulate it on Web-SIG for a little bit before bringing it to python-dev. No single person should really be able to block all this. I'll try to write something up that incorporates all of your notes. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com