On 2011-01-08 13:16:52 -0800, P.J. Eby said:
In the limit case, it appears that any WSGI 1 server could provide an
(emulated) async WSGI2 implementation, simply by wrapping WSGI2 apps
with a finished version of the decorator in my sketch.
Or, since users could do it themselves, this would mean that WSGI2
deployment wouldn't be dependent on all server implementers immediately
turning out their own WSGI2 implementations.
This, if you'll pardon my language, is bloody awesome. :D That would
strongly drive adoption of WSGI2. Note that adapting a WSGI1
application to WSGI2 server would likewise be very handy, and I
suspect, even easier to implement.
- Alice.
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
