At 09:11 PM 1/10/2011 -0600, Timothy Farrell wrote:
PJ,
You seem to be old-hat at this so I'm looking for a little advise as
I draft this spec. It seems a bad idea to me to just say
environ['wsgi.executor'] will be a wrapped futures executor because
the api handled by the executor can and likely will change over
time. Am I write in thinking that a spec should be more specific in
saying that the executor object will have "these specific methods"
and so as future changes, the spec is not in danger of invalidation
due to the changes?
I'd actually just suggest something like:
future = environ['wsgiorg.future'](func, *args, **kw)
(You need to use the wsgiorg.* namespace for extension proposals like
this, btw.)
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
