Hello, while PEP-3333 declared as "final" (not sure if it means the same as "accepted"), I would like to draw your attention at this bug report[1].
Personally, I'd like to fix PEP in the way it resolves mentioned bug. But if you disagree with me, I'd like at least to add note about statements like: "object A should be of type TA" It's not common behavior for Python objects, and in some meaning it just breaks OOP in Python (see Liskov substitution principle[2]). Isn't this looks like unpythonic or at least as leaking abstraction? [1]: http://bugs.python.org/issue10935 [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liskov_substitution_principle _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
