On 2011-04-10 16:25:21 -0700, James Mills said:
+1 too. I would however like to see this idea developed in a generic
and useable way. ie: No zope/twisted deps or making it fit around
Django :)
Ideally it should be useable by the most basic (plain old WSGI).
The following are the collected ideas of myself and a few other users
in the WebCore chat room:
https://gist.github.com/911991
Being generic (i.e. using WSGI under-the-hood) and allowing generic
port assignments for other (non-web) networked applications is a design
goal.
The aversion to packaged zips is not entirely understandable to us; in
this case, a packaged copy of the application is produced via a
setup.py command, though in theory one could develop with that model
and just zip everything up in the end by hand.
Silver Lining seems to require too much in the way of hacking
(modifying .pth files, etc) to be reasonable.
— Alice.
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
