Tito

I will document and write a tutorial while i am building Virtual Appliance
for Web2py .



On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Tito Garrido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Very Cool! What do you use to customize os? Do you have a tutorial?
>
> Congratulations!
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Phyo Arkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot all!
>>
>> Yeah , Cherokee simplifies the need of SSH and Webmin. I do not setup
>> webmin due to history of multiple security vulnerabilities. With Cherokee
>> python + ajaxed , well designed admin interface to manage whole aspect of
>> web server , + web2py , they are the perfect match  , will be superb allies.
>>
>> i will start building VMware appliance for web2rokee soon.
>>
>> Massimo , what your expected features/specs for the appliances?
>>
>>
>> This is what i think of ::
>>
>>
>>    1. Autoboot DHCP
>>    2. CLI Configuration for system and network parameters [ what you want
>>    to have?]
>>    3. Web-based configuration  for system and network parameters [tell me
>>    your ideas too]
>>    4. Console Only ? or Minimal GUI ? or 2 versions?
>>    5. <200 MB
>>
>>
>> For minimal GUI only a few applications will b installed (Firefox ,
>> Xulrunner , Fluxbox or more light weight window manager )
>>
>> also web2pytizens  , Put all your ideas what you want to have.
>>
>> Oh forgot to mention , My Anti-virus and Anti-Spam mail gateway OS's
>> WebConfiguration interface is in Web2py. I made this for a company in UK.
>>
>>
>> here is the full OS if you want to try.
>> http://www.star-nix.com/LiveAVS-RC-FINAL.iso , I have attached some
>> screens for you
>>
>> Just by doing some modifications , i can convert it to web2py appliance
>> (will b debian based).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phyo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:17 PM, noobpythoncoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is AWESOME Phyo!
>>>
>>> THANKS!
>>>
>>> Our setup is FreeBSD + Apache + a proxy (and more, sigh) ... and
>>> though we use SSH and Webmin to manage this, they create a LOT of side
>>> issues eg security, poor auto-generated config statements...! Just the
>>> thought of migrating to a better solution ... or even tweaking what
>>> we've got now ... causes headaches here. There's just so much coding
>>> downtime from rebuilding servers (even with imaging), we conceded to
>>> sticking with what we've got.
>>>
>>> My teams next headache was going to be refining load-balancing and
>>> scaling our system to handle potential traffic spikes after our app
>>> launch, while hoping we don't break what we've already got! I'm being
>>> optimistic about possibly demand. ;-)  You've given us hope that we
>>> can migrate to a better server setup. Thank you so much!
>>>
>>> I can't believe we overlooked Cherokee! It's features look hot! It's
>>> hard to stray from the common path - but after my team using Java and
>>> then PHP... Python and web2py have been exceptionally more rewarding
>>> experiences for web app dev. We chose web2py because it takes the pain
>>> out of development and has a lot of 'goodies' built right in. Cherokee
>>> looks like it may do the same for serving web apps. This could be a
>>> perfect match!
>>>
>>> I'm going to set up an internal test at the end of this week. Please
>>> keep us up-to-date with your experiments! I'll try post my ones soon.
>>>
>>> From everyone here - you ROCK!
>>>
>>> Noob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Linux User #387870
> .........____
> .... _/_õ|__|
> ..º[ .-.___.-._| . . . .
> .__( o)__( o).:_______
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to