[web2py:14681] Re: new template.py

Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:28:21 -0800

1ms? Bah that's plenty of time to go get coffee while the webpage loads.

mdipierro wrote: 
I fixed a couple of things in the new template.py now it is 1ms slower
then the old one (in average, both complex and simple pages that I
have tested).

Massimo

On Jan 7, 9:56 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
  
On Jan 7, 9:25 am, DenesL <[email protected]> wrote:

    
parsing instead of using regular expressions.
        
I was under the impression that you were using regex for speed, is
parsing faster?.
      
I benchmarked it. In this case makes no difference.



    
2) you use {{,}} inside strings as in
{{="hello {{ world }}" }} without running into trouble.
        
Simpler = better.
      
agree. what is "simpler" in this case?



    
3) you can do
<html>
{{
for i in range(10):
=i
pass}}
        
</html>
and =i is interpreted as response.write(i).
This was suggested by Denes.
        
Just to clarify, my suggestion was to able to copy/paste the code
without the need to split it up with braces and pass statements, while
at the same time interpret =x as response.write(x) if = was the first
non-blank char in a line.
Testing tells me that the new template.py removes the need for braces
inside the code but still requires 'pass', correct?.
      
correct, this is only part of your patch.

Anyway, I ma still not happy with template.py....

Massimo
    

  

-- 
Timothy Farrell <[email protected]>
Computer Guy
Statewide General Insurance Agency (www.swgen.com)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to