OK with the last suggestion.
Uploading to trunk now. Thanks Markus.
On Mar 1, 9:19 am, Markus Gritsch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:05 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You are right but we need to keep backward compatibility.
>
> > read pools as pool s. = pool size
>
> Well, IMO backward campatibility cannot be used in this case to
> justify a misleading API. The parameter 'pools' is not documented in
> the book andhttp://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/AlterEgo/default/show/169
> explicitly says "At this point the feature works but it has to be
> considered experimental and more tests are welcome."
>
> So IMO it should be possible to change the API before it is officially
> documented. And even if this is not the case, maybe it would be
> possible to keep 'pools' for backwards compatibility and add a new
> parameter called 'pool_size' which gets officially documented.
>
> Markus
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
