give me some time, I need to polish it with some improvements also on the
redis cache side.
The current implementation is quite dumb (but redis is fast so no-one
noticed problems).
If you're up with testing it at least I can be sure it will work on 3
machines (my test rig, my production env, your test rig).
Il giorno lunedì 8 ottobre 2012 18:07:50 UTC+2, rif ha scritto:
>
> I find it better than memcache because the sessions would survive a
> restart. So while I can settle on using memcache but I feel like I am
> loosing something.
>
> I really see no reason to store them on the disk or in db (except limited
> memory).
>
> -rif
>
> luni, 8 octombrie 2012, 18:44:09 UTC+3, Niphlod a scris:
>>
>> ATM, storing session in redis is a bunch of lines put together a month
>> ago by me, but it needs to be tested carefully before releasing it.
>> Moreover, it's possible that there are 3 peoples using redis with web2py
>> (me, you, bruno), so I prefer spending time on developing other things.
>>
>> Il giorno lunedì 8 ottobre 2012 17:29:32 UTC+2, rif ha scritto:
>>>
>>> ## connect to Google BigTable (optional 'google:datastore://namespace')
>>> db = DAL('google:datastore')
>>> ## store sessions and tickets there
>>> session.connect(request, response, db = db)
>>> ## or store session in Memcache, Redis, etc.
>>>
>>> The last line above misled me. so it is possible to store them in
>>> memcache but not in redis...
>>>
>>
--
