Why not just use before_update? On Friday, November 9, 2012 10:53:21 AM UTC-7, Jim S wrote: > > I'm missing something. I have a table where I want to react to changes to > a particular field. I'm trying to use the _after_update callback check for > this. However, using this it appears to me that I am only seeing the data > values after the update. I can't see what they were before the update so I > don't know which fields we actually updated. Is there a 'bef'ore' buffer > available that I'm missing? I'm trying to capture changes made using a > smartgrid. Any tips would be appreciated. > > -Jim >
--
