I do not think it is our business to argue about the outcome of specific talks. It is our business to discuss general trends and policies as members of the Python community.
On Thursday, 6 December 2012 14:03:29 UTC-6, VP wrote: > > > > On Thursday, December 6, 2012 11:05:52 AM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> Hello VP, >> >> I proposed two talks. i do not remember the exact tiles: >> >> - one was about new web2py features: wiki, scheduler, components >> > > This sounds like an update on web2py. Playing the devil's advocate, one > can argue that since web2py has been featured in previous PyCon, such an > "update" might not be substantial enough, or not as substantial as other > proposed talks. > > > > >> - one was about my experience in teaching programming and how we can do >> it better by teaching we programming >> > > On the other hand, I feel this proposed talk is worthy of PyCon. > > Seriously, I do not think at this point Web2py needs to be promoted at > PyCon. It is relatively established; those in the Python community should > know of its existence. If they like it, they will use it. If they don't, > its gonna be hard to sell it to them. This type of talks should be > promoted at educational conferences. If you can convince a handful of > professors and teachers to adopt Web2py for their classrooms, I think > web2py will have a very long and healthy future. > > > > > > > > > --
