does setting migrate=False in the 2nd app (recommended method) trigger the table definition ?
On Monday, December 10, 2012 8:08:18 PM UTC+1, Cliff Kachinske wrote: > > I have several applications that share tables. One such is called > "attachments." > > As part of my upgrade to 2.2.1, I enabled record versioning in each of > these apps. I have a specific sequence for opening appadmin in these > applications to migrate the tables in case of changes. > > When I migrated the first application, it created the archive table for > attachments. So far, so good. > > When I attempted to migrate the second application, it also attempted to > create the archive table for attachments. Because the table already > exists, Psycopg2 raised an exception, 'relation "attachments_archive" > already exists.' > > Is there a way to avoid this? > > Would it make sense to have tools.enable_record_versioning or > dal._enable_record_versioning check for the existence of the archive table > before trying to create it? > --
