fcgi should work but try upload and download of large files. That's the only thing I would be uncertain about because I do I am not sure how they work with fcgi.
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 22:36:11 UTC-6, rh wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:49:10 -0800 (PST) > Massimo Di Pierro > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > Mod python has beed deprecated for many years. Technically web2py > > runs on it but I do not know of anybody who does that. fcgi should > > work although I only of people who use it with cherokee, not apache. > > For apache I suggest mod_wsgi or mod_proxy. > > mod_wsgi is not available, not sure about mod_proxy but the limitation, > if it were available, would be config via .htaccess. > > I am trying the fastcgi solution now. > > > > > On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 16:31:57 UTC-6, rh wrote: > > > > > > Was curious to know why many hosting companies don't enable > > > mod_wsgi? I know many use debian and tend to be more conservative. > > > So is it simply that mod_wsgi isn't available by debian stable? > > > > > > I have found info about running web2py under apache and there's > > > mention of flup but flup doesn't look to be currently maintained. > > > (website's down) What is the preferred way to deploy web2py under > > > apache? mod_python, fastcgi or something else? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- > > > --
