You can find them using the manage pages option. That allows the editors and authors to search by title or content. The problem is about the public search pages. Should all pages be searchable? Without fill text search we can use belong but it may be slow.
On Sunday, 20 January 2013 12:58:28 UTC-6, viniciusban wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Massimo Di Pierro > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > The issue to be considered is that this will not work on Google App > Engine > > and it may considerable slow down searches for many wiki pages. > > Massimo, I think there's another issue, because Auth.wiki() allows me > to save a page without any tag and cannot find it later. > If this isn't a problem in search, it is a problem when saving the page. > > IMHO, this is a search problem, because I'm not supposed to tag every > page I save. > > About the GAE problem, I can't say anything because I don't know it. > But if you strip out the part that make the count, it should work for > rdbms. > > > Should we break request.var.q in tokens and search that each of > > them is in tags or in title even out of order? > > I think yes. > > > > > > > On Friday, 18 January 2013 10:29:05 UTC-6, viniciusban wrote: > >> > >> Massimo, in Wiki.search() method, there is this code: > >> if query is None: > >> query = (db.wiki_page.id == db.wiki_tag.wiki_page) &\ > >> (db.wiki_tag.name.belongs(tags)) > >> query = query | > >> db.wiki_page.title.contains(request.vars.q) > >> > >> So, search touches title, too. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Massimo Di Pierro > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > RIght now wiki search only searches by tag. Perhaps you should also > >> > search > >> > by title? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, 17 January 2013 19:19:58 UTC-6, viniciusban wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I've had a problem today, trying to search auth.wiki pages without > >> >> tags, but they aren't found. > >> >> > >> >> As tags aren't required to save a page, I think this is a problem in > >> >> Wiki.search() method. > >> >> > >> >> What do you think? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > > > --
