I am using memcached for caching cache.ram and cache.disk, the
configuration is really easy, this is mine:
if not request.is_local:
from gluon.contrib.memcache import MemcacheClient
memcache_servers = ['127.0.0.1:11211']
cache.memcache = MemcacheClient(request, memcache_servers)
cache.ram = cache.disk = cache.memcache
but I don't know how to understand the gain of using it. Any idea?
paolo
On Friday, January 25, 2013 9:51:22 PM UTC+1, Arnon Marcus wrote:
>
> Oh, and what about memcache?
> Can web2py benefit from it? Is there somewhere an explanation about this?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Arnon Marcus
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> 10x for clearing things out - you're right, I didn't do too much resource
>> on uwsgi, and just assumed that it is, for nginx. what mod_wsgi is for
>> apache.
>> So I guess I had it wrong.
>> My current (soon to be "old") setup is running apache + mod_wsgi on
>> windows 7, so I know all about the headaches that comes from setting this
>> up...
>> I would be more than glad to put apache behind me for good, if it would
>> offer not performance improvements to this script's setup the way it does
>> for php...
>>
>> On that note, how exactly is uwsgi handling web2py processes, as would
>> be configured in this script? Is it easily customizable after the fact?
>> Are there any any pros/cons for different scenarios that one should be
>> aware of?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Niphlod <[email protected] <javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> seems you missed a point.... uwsgi here is not a module, is an
>>> executable that does one job and it does it well (actually, very well, and
>>> there's a lot of it that can be used that is outside the scope of this
>>> script).
>>> It could be used as a standalone highperformance webserver, but nginx is
>>> placed in front of it to serve static files and to take care of Ddos
>>> attacks.
>>>
>>> If you want to use apache behind nginx instead of uwsgi behind nginx
>>> you're going basically to suffer wasted cpu, ram, a much harder to maintain
>>> config.
>>> If you want to run python on apache because it's your default webserver,
>>> than mod_wsgi is the way to go. Have to install apache just to run python,
>>> it's only a waste of resources.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
