I would gladly accept if anyone else could provide me web2py application with same spesifications as this shootout had. I would do it myself but it is unfair for web2py (I'm just getting to know it) if I would do it and test it with other frameworks :)
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:08:50 AM UTC+2, OJ wrote: > > Could you send it to me? Or did you mean that you don't have it anymore :) > > I tried to contact the author about it, but haven't heard from him. > > On Saturday, February 2, 2013 10:40:36 PM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> I do not recall. I do not see it there which is strange. >> >> On Saturday, 2 February 2013 05:24:05 UTC-6, OJ wrote: >>> >>> Massimo, where can I find your patch? I understood that you submitted >>> web2py -patch for the shootout. I'm currently interested to see how hw >>> aspect would have effect to results and I need web2py to be part of it. >>> >>> On Monday, February 20, 2012 3:51:36 PM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>>> >>>> I did submit a patch. I also submitted a comment on reddit. Those >>>> benchmarks are misleading. For example in Django they use the ORM but >>>> in Flask they use native sqlite, not SQLAlchemy. In Django I think >>>> they have sessions enabled, in Flask, I think no. >>>> >>>> On Feb 19, 11:23 pm, Bruno Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I did not see web2py on the list... >>>> > Em 20/02/2012 03:03, "pbreit" <[email protected]> escreveu: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >http://blog.curiasolutions.com/the-great-web-framework-shootout/ >>>> > >https://github.com/seedifferently/the-great-web-framework-shootout >>> >>> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
