I do not have a strong opinion but I do not see a problem with unconditionally decoding. Shall I wait for a patch?
On Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:54:12 UTC-6, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > > I have something like IS_MATCH(ur'(?u)[\w ]+', strict=True) for a field. > > I added the re.U override because I needed to enter Ballarò and Agorà. > Oddly, it accepted Ballarò, but not Agorà. > > I *think* what's going on is that IS_MATCH ends up looking at the UTF-8 > string, not the Unicode string, when it applies the regex. Does that seem > plausible? If so, should we be unconditionally decoding such strings in > validators, or does IS_MATCH (and perhaps others?) need an explicit option? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
