> - membership
> - permission
> - end table
> with the everybody_group_id logic, probably other 2 queries.
Now I understand why there's no accessible_query for NoSQL, not even in the
roadmap. No user would accept making 4 or 5 db queries for filtering rows
in a single request. This may work in a prototype with a couple of records,
but would take a lot of resources with thousands of records in production.
I guess the only alternative is writing rbac data on each record with an
optional field factory when creating auth (for an implementation in the
Auth class), but It is a partial solution. It would not solve handling
custom rights because, AFAIK, you would need one field for each permission
type ("read", "update", "custom", ...) and also it seems a lot stuff for
implementing a single rbac feature.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.