Ricardo, not, in my oppinion. First, because this approach is used by a developer, who knows how table columns are named. He owns the source code, right? ;-)
Second, because it's designed to be used mainly in models/ files, to organize methods of a table. Again, we face the 1st point, above. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Ricardo Pedroso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Vinicius Assef <[email protected]> wrote: >> I created a decorator to allow binding a function to a Table instance. >> >> IMHO, this helps organizing models, creating something similar to >> Django's managers. >> >> To an example, see: https://gist.github.com/viniciusban/5497532 >> >> To get an scaffolding application with organized model files and this >> decorator embedded, visit https://github.com/viniciusban/my_welcome >> >> Hope this helps somebody. >> >> Massimo, what do you think about embedding this decorator (or >> something better) in web2py, to allow creating table methods? > > Hi Vinicius, > > Does it make sense to check the attribute existence in the instance > before setting it? > or add a safe=True/False arg to check or not? > > Ricardo > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
