I think Niphlod has some valid points. As far as the design goes, I like Bootstrap 2 and 3 both, they are just different. Hm... I do quite like the looks of BS 2, perhaps even more than 3...
As I was starting some of the past web2py projects of mine, I've been constantly saying to myself: "I'll take the time and do a welcome app with Gumby [1] or Foundation [2] first, then go from there..." And you can guess... there was never time for this. I seem to be in a period when every project is a rush. Anyway, I was trying to say that there are other things out there besides BS, some of the other projects are quite nice. Regards, Ales [1] http://gumbyframework.com/ [2] http://foundation.zurb.com/ On Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:40:50 AM UTC+2, Niphlod wrote: > > I think the main reason to switch is the "mobile first" redesign (apart > from the fact that given the "push" that bootstrap has, several > features/plugins/etc will be built around that). On top of that, js plugins > have been improved and rewritten to take care of some bugs. I like the > improvements over the forms markup, as well to the choice to have one grid > system only. > > https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/pull/6342 is the documented changelog. > > PS: rounded buttons with a "bevel-like" effect are so 2010 :-P > > On Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:04:49 AM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> Why is 3 better than 2 other than the higher number? The buttons do not >> look as nice. >> >> On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 10:56:39 UTC-5, VP wrote: >>> >>> not quite compatible with web2py yet. Navbar are all messed up. >>> Possibly other things as well. >>> >>> I think no more span-12, span-10, etc. new syntax is col-lg-12, etc. >>> >>> >>> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
