*To Alan E.*
*Q»* Will it break *backward compatibility*, then? That will be bad. Please implement the new feature in such a way that Emails can be retrieved easily by *Message.Content[i]* for plaintext and html. And * Message.Attachments[ii]* and *Message.Attachments[ii].type* for attachments and attachment types. Make it Easy, Simple, and Intuitive. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 12:42:48 PM UTC-4, Alan Etkin wrote: > > >> - Does this mean that *message.content* will not work in the future? >> >> This is because the current adapter uses an invalid field type for > attachment and content fields that can raise errors when used with other > core features. In order to keep those fields, they should have custom field > types (experimental), since none of the built-in types is suitable for them. > >> >> - Also, does it mean than the users will have to write their own >> message content extraction by traversing the MIME Multipart? >> >> Yes, unless the above issue is solved. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
