Just to name an other one, I've used backbonejs for a project, it was the right choice for my purposes. it is very easy to develop a client side app if you have a rest back-end. http://backbonejs.org/
Paolo On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:48:03 AM UTC+2, Andrew W wrote: > > I want to use the template capabilities of web2py for server side script > generation, not just html. From my brief look at the ractive website I'm > wondering if it is any better than what web2py does now. Do I really want > a js library for this for server side templating. I could use node but I > can't see a reason to change. > > Massimo, are you thinking of changing the templating approach ? > > > On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 6:25:17 AM UTC+12, Derek wrote: >> >> I prefer jqote2 and jquery pesonally. It's one of the fastest out there >> and the templates are pretty simple yet flexible. >> >> On Sunday, June 15, 2014 1:34:25 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed. >>> Instead today my favorite client-side stack is based on these: >>> >>> - jquery.js >>> - sugar.js >>> - ractive.js >>> - semantic-ui (css & js) >>> >>> Have you tried sugar, ractive, and semantic-ui? What is your opinion? >>> >>> Massimo >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
