Hi Simone, I came across on old post of yours mentioning uswgi. I downloaded cygwin, cloned uswgi and v 2.0 built first time in about two minutes so that was easy (this was on a 32 bit Windows Server 2003, an old machine not in use).
But before I learn how to use it ... should I? In the earlier post (last year) you seemed enthusiastic. It seems to offer the chance of a pool of processes even on Windows (thanks to cygwin) which is what interests me... easy load balancing for moderate work loads. Did you go any further with it? On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 06:32:04 UTC+10, Niphlod wrote: > > well, to be fair nginx config takes ~80 rows and other ~20 for uwsgi and > another ~10 for putting uwsgi under upstart. > apache is ~40 lines. Are they more "flexible" ? Yep. > > Let's not forget that if wfastcgi.py was "embeddable" in web2py as an > adapter (but I didn't check the license), 10 clicks OR 4 lines of config > for a proper supported and configured setup for web2py under IIS aren't > that much. And it works also in Azure, since the baseline is usually > WS2012R2. > > On Monday, September 8, 2014 12:59:47 PM UTC+2, Tim Richardson wrote: >> >> ye gods. One wonders if a virtual linux server is not the answer. >> > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
