and I would constrain - so nothing upload / nothing download... like I said, needs some thinking...
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > perhpas a vm image could be made to work... reinitialized every 4, or 12 > or whatever hours?; in it, a new web2py instance per user could be > possible... or per session (with long persistent sessions)... there are > things to think about, but... > > Others do stuff like this, so it can be done... like I said before, I don't > know how big a priority it is right now. > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:51 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Do you expect me to run admin that allows everybody to upload and run >> files on my system? ;-) >> >> On Jun 7, 8:46 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: >> > but also it's not a functioning admin; it doesn't do anything (it lets >> you >> > see the editing interfaces, and go thru the motions, but not realize the >> > effect... I think Tim was suggesting something more functional). Not >> sure >> > how big a priority this is at this point, all things considered... >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:32 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > it is very old. At east 6 months. >> > >> > > On Jun 7, 6:14 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > this seems like an old version (the admin interface at least is >> old)... >> > > > also, it doesn't seem like a "real" app - rather a faux front. >> > >> > > > For example, the sql.log is dated 2008.03.30; so I try to extend >> the >> > > model >> > > > by an extra email, to see if sql.log changes; it does not. The edit >> > > isn't >> > > > there when I immediately go back.... >> > >> > > > ... so given what I know are the difficulties, this only "looks" >> like it >> > > > might be real.... it will not take long for people to realize it is >> a >> > > shell. >> > >> > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > have you seen? >> > >> > > > >https://www.web2py.com/demo_admin >> > >> > > > > (the site unreachable now) >> > > > > I am open to something better of course. >> > >> > > > > Massimo >> > >> > > > > On Jun 7, 4:02 pm, Tim Michelsen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > I think that web2py could need more of this. >> > >> > > > > > why don't you set up a demo installation where prospecive users >> could >> > > > > > create a test installation? >> > > > > > GAE seems to be perfect for this. >> > >> > > > > > then, you can show the guys in doubt (@reddit) how to evaluate >> your >> > > > > program. >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
