Someday, I'll try ansible. Spelling correction to the rescue. On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 7:51:06 PM UTC-7, Lewis wrote: > > Thanks for all this. > > So, the world seems to back UWSGI as the preferrred solution. I'll get > over it. I see that you are saying that once when one does need > performance tuning with multiple workers, uwsgi is both more performant and > more tunable. > > I think having a fabric deploy script will solve my problems. > > Someday I'll try unusable. > > Enough for now. >
-- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
