Yes. It should. I agree. We should leave the sections on Apache but comment they we do not recommend apache.
On Monday, 3 August 2015 10:23:58 UTC-5, Niphlod wrote: > > IMHO given that the majority of issues reported come with "one step > production deployment" keywords, the book chapter > http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/13/deployment-recipes#One-step-production-deployment > > should be redacted to point to the script provisioning uwsgi and nginx > instead of the bugged one provisioning apache. > > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 7:19:54 PM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> I think that commit should be reversed. O changed to processes=5 >> threads=1. but this may cause an increased memory usage and it is not a >> good thing with apache. Agreed that Apache is no longer recommended (not >> just for web2py users) but we should continue to support it because it is >> still the mots popular web server. >> >>> >>>>>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
