On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 2:09:45 PM UTC-8, p a wrote: > > I like the idea of a new framework, using python 3 but that's not the most > important. These days if we want to attract developers to our projects we > also need to have an API, and separated front end and back end. web2py is > great for the backend. The DAL is fantastic, and every time I get close to > an ORM I appreciate it even more. After trying out ractive for myself, I > really like Massimo's idea of integrating web2py and ractive. > So I would love to see a new framework, if we can work on a clear upgrade > path that would take existing web2py apps to the new framework. It's much > easier to port a web app than a framework, on which many web apps rely. I > think we should release the web2py dev team from the chains of backwards > compatibility once every few years. If there is a new framework based on > the DAL and the other good stuff from web2py, but also using ractive and > other technologies and good ideas suggested on this list, then porting our > web apps would take a reasonable effort, and it would be well worth it. >
Maybe call it web2py-R ? /dps "only half in jest" -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
