Flask is great if you are services cached content because it a very small overhead. But it it not a microframework. If you add jinja2 and sqlalchemy it is bigger than web2py and does less. It is faster because does less.
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 11:10:01 UTC-6, Vinhthuy wrote: > > Bottle is one of the few true micro framework. Flask is great, but I have > always felt its mission kinda lacks vision. People love Flask for its > "flexibility" and "thinness" and "pluggability". Surely, it's great when > you built thin apps. Sooner or later, you will realize that your apps need > non trivial features. There are lots of Flask pluggins you can use. But > year and a half later, after you find some bugs or needed feature, and you > find out that the plugin author got a new job and couldn't care less about > his Flask plugin. Then you are screwed. > > > > > On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 11:05:49 PM UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> You see. we do not need that. Because we do not have a fragmented >> ecosystem like Flask or Django made of many separate parts maintained by >> different people. >> Web2py has many more built in features and we make sure all the pieces >> work together by shipping them together. >> >> Massimo >> >> On Monday, 7 December 2015 20:54:19 UTC-6, Richard wrote: >>> >>> I fall on this : >>> >>> https://github.com/pocoo/metaflask >>> >>> It interesting. >>> >>> Richard >>> >> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
