There is something I don't understand... I put a couple of print statments
to see if my cached vars was in globals() and I discover that my var was
never there...

I am lost completly... If it pass throught my "if" my dict will be
recreated each request...

:(

Richard

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Richard Vézina <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, this may be an option (update whole dict in Redis)... Mean time I get
> rid of them, if I can succeed in that...
>
> :)
>
> Thanks Anthony.
>
> Richard
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 11:12:12 AM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
>>>
>>> This is true for any other cache except cache.ram right?
>>>
>>
>> Right. cache.ram works because it doesn't have to pickle a Python object
>> and put it into external storage (and therefore create a fresh copy of the
>> stored object via unpickling at retrieval time). Rather, it simply stores a
>> pointer to the existing Python object within the current Python process. Of
>> course, this limits cache.ram to a single process, so if your app is being
>> served by multiple processes, each will have its own version of cache.ram.
>>
>>
>>> If so, there is no gain with cache.redis the way I use it...
>>>
>>
>> Well, the gain with Redis is that it will actually work, though you will
>> have to adjust your code to save the whole dictionary back to the cache
>> upon update.
>>
>>
>>> @Anthony, are you sure about the issue with uwsgi/nginx and cache.ram
>>> dict update?
>>>
>>
>> I think so. You might try configuring uwsgi to run a single process with
>> multiple threads instead of using multiple processes. Not sure how that
>> will impact performance.
>>
>>
>>> I guess, I should start to look at how to get rid of these global dict
>>> while not degrading system performance. There surely place where I use
>>> these global vars that wouldn't suffer from a little query to the backend,
>>> but for grid where the performance was the greatest or simplifying code was
>>> acheive with those it will be difficult to stop using them...
>>>
>>
>> Is it really a problem to write the whole dictionary to Redis? How often
>> are updates happening?
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>> --
>> Resources:
>> - http://web2py.com
>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "web2py-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to